<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
						<!-- generator="e107" -->
						<!-- content type="News" -->
						<rss version="0.92">
						<channel>
						<title>AI Ramblings : News</title>
						<link>/blog/</link>
						<description></description>
						<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 20:59:00 +0200</lastBuildDate>
						<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>

							<item>
							<title>Objects as epistemological artifacts</title>
							<description>To follow on a few arguments I had at some blogs like Gödel’s Lost Letter, vetta project, Machine Learning (Theory) and The n-Category Café I thin</description>
							<author>Kevembuangga&lt;jld@nospam.com&gt;</author>
							<link>http://www.kevembuangga.com/blog/news.php?item.10.1</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Almost right...</title>
							<description>I found a paper by Diederik Aerts about composite concepts recognition which in spite of the mouthful of the title (General Quantum Modeling of Combin</description>
							<author>Kevembuangga&lt;jld@nospam.com&gt;</author>
							<link>http://www.kevembuangga.com/blog/news.php?item.9.1</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>The smell of Strong AI</title>
							<description>In my decades long survey of the field I had totally overlooked the works of  Jerry Hobbs, yet he seems on the right path, still a bit entangled in "o</description>
							<author>Kevembuangga&lt;jld@nospam.com&gt;</author>
							<link>http://www.kevembuangga.com/blog/news.php?item.8.1</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Roger Schank defects</title>
							<description>In a recent answer to The Edge Annual Question  Roger Schank said: When reporters interviewed me in the 70's and 80's about the possibilities for Arti</description>
							<author>Kevembuangga&lt;jld@nospam.com&gt;</author>
							<link>http://www.kevembuangga.com/blog/news.php?item.7.1</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Seeing the forest from the trees (of "open problems")</title>
							<description>Anyone having had an interest in AI for a while has surely collected a list of "open problems" or "key problems" like the one Peter Turney recently bl</description>
							<author>Kevembuangga&lt;jld@nospam.com&gt;</author>
							<link>http://www.kevembuangga.com/blog/news.php?item.6.1</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Is competition a problem?</title>
							<description>Daniel Lemire and Peter Turney have had an argument about the benefits of competition versus cooperation in science.Since my opinions are (as usual...</description>
							<author>Kevembuangga&lt;jld@nospam.com&gt;</author>
							<link>http://www.kevembuangga.com/blog/news.php?item.5.1</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>Reification</title>
							<description>After posting a somewhat abstruse comment at Apperceptual  where I struggled to explain the reasons why I reject some forms of "obstinate rationality"</description>
							<author>Kevembuangga&lt;jld@nospam.com&gt;</author>
							<link>http://www.kevembuangga.com/blog/news.php?item.4.1</link>
							</item>
							<item>
							<title>A brand new blog</title>
							<description>As it becomes harder and harder to keep a consistent conversation over other people blogs I finally made it. I expect to gather here the follow ups of</description>
							<author>Kevembuangga&lt;jld@nospam.com&gt;</author>
							<link>http://www.kevembuangga.com/blog/news.php?item.3.1</link>
							</item>
						</channel>
						</rss>